All Articles

Strongly Typing React Props with TypeScript

Matt Pocock
Matt PocockMatt is a well-regarded TypeScript expert known for his ability to demystify complex TypeScript concepts.

When you're working in a React app, declaring a type for your React props is likely going to be your most common TypeScript activity.

There's some debate over the best method for typing props. In this article, I'll show you the pros and cons of each method and give you my recommendation.

If you want to learn by doing, check out my free interactive course on React and TypeScript.

The 3 Methods of Typing Props

Inline Object Literals

Props can be declared using an inline object literal.

tsx
import { ReactNode } from "react";
 
const Wrapper = (props: {
children?: ReactNode;
}) => {
return <div>{props.children}</div>;
};

Prop types can also be destructured, leading to a strange {}: {} syntax.

tsx
import { ReactNode } from "react";
 
const Wrapper = ({
children,
}: {
children?: ReactNode;
}) => {
return <div>{children}</div>;
};

Type Aliases

Prop types can also be extracted to a type alias:

tsx
import { ReactNode } from "react";
 
export type WrapperProps = {
children?: ReactNode;
};
 
const Wrapper = (props: WrapperProps) => {
return <div>{props.children}</div>;
};

Type aliases should always be exported along with the component - that way you can use them in other files if needed.

Props declared in a type alias can also be destructured:

tsx
const Wrapper = ({ children }: WrapperProps) => {
return <div>{children}</div>;
};

Interfaces

Interfaces are another way to declare props:

tsx
import { ReactNode } from "react";
 
export interface WrapperProps {
children?: ReactNode;
}
 
const Wrapper = (props: WrapperProps) => {
return <div>{props.children}</div>;
};

Just like type aliases, interfaces should always be exported so they can be reused later.

And, just like type aliases, interfaces can be destructured.

tsx
const Wrapper = ({ children }: WrapperProps) => {
return <div>{children}</div>;
};

Now that we've seen all the methods, let's look at all the pros and cons before we make our final decision.

Use A React Props Code Snippet

The main benefit of inline object literals is speed. You can type your props quickly and move on.

The issue becomes that inline object literals will, eventually, need to be extracted out to a type.

So if you're writing a component, you should probably use a type alias or interface.

To get over this hurdle, I'd advise writing your own code snippets for type aliases and interfaces.

Here's a code snippet that will work in VSCode for creating your own components.

json
{
"component": {
"prefix": "comp",
"body": [
"export interface $1Props {",
" $2",
"}",
"",
"export const $1 = (props: $1Props) => {",
" return $3",
"}"
]
}
}

Autocompleting to comp will expand to a component with an interface, both exported.

Interfaces over Intersections

My opinions on type aliases vs. interfaces are well documented in this article. In short, I prefer the type in general because of the 'declaration merging' property of the interface, which can confuse and frustrate beginners.

But there's one particular case where interfaces win over type aliases - that's in creating complex intersections of props.

Let's say you're creating a component that has all the props of input but needs to add a label prop. You'll need to extend from the ComponentProps type helper, described in my article.

It is tempting to use a type alias:

tsx
import { ComponentProps } from "react";
 
export type InputProps =
ComponentProps<"input"> & {
label: string;
};
 
export function Input({
label,
...props
}: InputProps) {
return (
<label>
{label}
<input {...props} />
</label>
);
}

But unfortunately, intersections used this way will, on the scale of a large codebase, slow TypeScript down.

Instead, you should use an interface, using interface extends:

tsx
import { ComponentProps } from "react";
 
export interface InputProps
extends ComponentProps<"input"> {
label: string;
}

This advice comes from TypeScript's performance wiki, as well as a PR from Sentry's codebase that sped up their type checking by removing these intersections in favor of interfaces.

So in situations where you're extending from other types, use interfaces.

Final Thoughts

In general, you should use interface to declare your props. They're the most performant, and with a code snippet, they're fast to write.

If you've already got props declared using type or inline object literals, don't worry - this isn't worth a refactor.

But if your codebase starts to feel sluggish in your IDE, check for intersections in your props. If you find any, try to refactor them to interface extends.

Matt's signature

Share this article with your friends

`any` Considered Harmful, Except For These Cases

Discover when it's appropriate to use TypeScript's any type despite its risks. Learn about legitimate cases where any is necessary.

Matt Pocock
Matt Pocock

No, TypeScript Types Don't Exist At Runtime

Learn why TypeScript's types don't exist at runtime. Discover how TypeScript compiles down to JavaScript and how it differs from other strongly-typed languages.

Matt Pocock
Matt Pocock

Deriving vs Decoupling: When NOT To Be A TypeScript Wizard

In this book teaser, we discuss deriving vs decoupling your types: when building relationships between your types or segregating them makes sense.

Matt Pocock
Matt Pocock

NoInfer: TypeScript 5.4's New Utility Type

Learn how TypeScript's new utility type, NoInfer, can improve inference behavior by controlling where types are inferred in generic functions.

Matt Pocock
Matt Pocock